For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
December 13, 2001
ABM Treaty Fact Sheet
Statement by the Press Secretary
Announcement of Withdrawal from the Abm Treaty
The circumstances affecting U.S. national security have changed
fundamentally since the signing of the ABM Treaty in
1972. The attacks against the U.S. homeland on September 11
vividly demonstrate that the threats we face today are far different
from those of the Cold War. During that era, now fortunately
in the past, the United States and the Soviet Union were locked in an
implacably hostile relationship. Each side deployed
thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at the other. Our
ultimate security rested largely on the grim premise that neither side
would launch a nuclear attack because doing so would result in a
counter-attack ensuring the total destruction of both nations.
Today, our security environment is profoundly
different. The Cold War is over. The Soviet Union
no longer exists. Russia is not an enemy, but in fact is
increasingly allied with us on a growing number of critically important
issues. The depth of United States-Russian cooperation in
counterterrorism is both a model of the new strategic relationship we
seek to establish and a foundation on which to build further
cooperation across the broad spectrum of political, economic and
security issues of mutual interest.
Today, the United States and Russia face new threats to their
security. Principal among these threats are weapons of mass
destruction and their delivery means wielded by terrorists and rogue
states. A number of such states are acquiring increasingly
longer-range ballistic missiles as instruments of blackmail and
coercion against the United States and its friends and
allies. The United States must defend its homeland, its
forces and its friends and allies against these threats. We
must develop and deploy the means to deter and protect against them,
including through limited missile defense of our territory.
Under the terms of the ABM Treaty, the United States is prohibited
from defending its homeland against ballistic missile
attack. We are also prohibited from cooperating in
developing missile defenses against long-range threats with our friends
and allies. Given the emergence of these new threats to our
national security and the imperative of defending against them, the
United States is today providing formal notification of its withdrawal
from the ABM Treaty. As provided in Article XV of that
Treaty, the effective date of withdrawal will be six months from
today.
At the same time, the United States looks forward to
moving ahead with Russia in developing elements of a new
strategic relationship.
- In the inter-related area of offensive
nuclear forces, we welcome President Putin's commitment to deep cuts in
Russian nuclear forces, and reaffirm our own commitment to reduce U.S.
nuclear forces significantly.
- We look forward to continued
consultations on how to achieve increased transparency and
predictability regarding reductions in offensive nuclear forces.
- We also look forward to continued
consultations on transparency, confidence building, and cooperation on
missile defenses, such as joint exercises and potential joint
development programs.
- The United States also plans to discuss
with Russia ways to establish regular defense planning talks to
exchange information on strategic force issues, and to deepen
cooperation on efforts to prevent and deal with the effects of the
spread of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.
The United States intends to expand cooperation in each of these
areas and to work intensively with Russia to further develop and
formalize the new strategic relationship between the two countries.
The United States believes that moving beyond the ABM Treaty will
contribute to international peace and security. We stand
ready to continue our active dialogue with allies, China, and other
interested states on all issues associated with strategic stability and
how we can best cooperate to meet the threats of the 21st
century. We believe such a dialogue is in the interest of
all states.
# # #
|